Truthlytics - Beyond The Headlines
  • Social Image
  • Social Image
  • Social Image
  • Social Image
  • Social Image
  • Social Image
Truthlytics - Beyond The Headlines

International Media: Almost No Resistance Against Trump’s Coup

people, woman, self talk, mirrors, communication, reflection, faces, monitor, perspective, social, media, portrait, community, friends, lots, diversity, social media, population, connectedness, media, media, diversity, social media, social media, social media, social media, social media

Correspondent Warns of a “Coup” in the U.S. Under Trump

On February 6, 2025, Austrian public broadcaster ORF aired a startling analysis from correspondent Thomas Langpaul, who claimed that a coup is taking place in the United States under President Donald Trump. According to Langpaul, Trump is systematically reshaping the U.S. government by removing officials who uphold the Constitution and replacing them with loyalists who strictly follow his policies. Even more alarming, he notes, is that this is happening with little resistance.

A Slow-Motion Coup?

The term “coup” is typically associated with military takeovers or violent uprisings. However, what Langpaul suggests is a gradual and systemic power grab, where institutions are weakened from within rather than overthrown in a dramatic event. This aligns with growing concerns from legal scholars, political analysts, and democracy watchdogs who argue that Trump’s administration is actively eroding checks and balances in ways that could permanently alter American governance.

Reports indicate that Trump has purged career civil servants, reshaped the federal judiciary, and restructured key government agencies to be staffed with individuals who prioritize loyalty over law. If this trend continues, the independence of the judiciary, the rule of law, and the democratic process itself could be at risk.

Why Is There So Little Resistance?

Langpaul’s most striking observation is that there has been little pushback. Given the magnitude of Trump’s changes, one would expect significant opposition from lawmakers, institutions, and civil society. Instead, Langpaul suggests that the normalization of these actions has made resistance muted or ineffective.

Key questions now arise:

  • Are U.S. institutions still capable of pushing back against authoritarian overreach?
  • Why is the political opposition failing to mobilize stronger resistance?
  • Is the media adequately covering these developments, or is the narrative being controlled?

If these questions remain unanswered, American democracy may be facing its greatest challenge yet.

Global Implications: A Warning for Europe and Beyond

Trump’s governance style has already influenced right-wing populist leaders across Europe, many of whom have pursued similar tactics—weakening democratic checks, silencing dissent, and consolidating power. If the U.S., long considered a global defender of democracy, succumbs to these forces, the consequences could ripple across the world.

For European nations, the lesson is clear: democracy is not self-sustaining. It must be actively defended against political actors who seek to undermine institutions from within. Countries like Hungary and Poland have already seen how democratic backsliding can become entrenched if left unchecked.

Share Your Perspective

We invite you to contribute your thoughts and analysis on this article in the comments below.

Subscribe to Truthlytics today to stay informed and dive deeper into the issues that matter.
Already subscribed? Log in to join the conversation and share your thoughts in the comments below!


Comments

Truthlytics - Beyond The Headlines


©2024 Truthlytics, a division and brand of Neptun Green Power d.o.o., Mrkopaljska ulica 5,10000 Zagreb, Croatia - OIB: HR34418596112. All Rights reserved. By using this service, website, newsletter, forum and other functions, users accept the Privacy Policy / Terms and Conditions / Cookie Policy. All content on this site, including text, graphics, logos, and software, is the exclusive property of the company or its licensors and is protected by intellectual property laws. Reproduction, distribution, or use of any material without prior written consent from the company is strictly prohibited. The company reserves the right to modify or update this disclaimer and any related terms and conditions at any time without prior notice. Continued use of the site or services constitutes acceptance of these changes. The content on this website, especially when marked as "Opinion" is intended for informational and entertainment purposes only. It may include elements of opinion, hyperbole, and satire and is not intended to be taken as factual reporting. Opinion content reflects the personal views of the contributors and should not be interpreted as verified factual reporting. This approach aligns with the precedent set in McDougal v. Fox News Network, LLC (Case No. 1:19-cv-11161-MKV, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York), in which the court ruled that a reasonable viewer would understand such content as hyperbolic commentary and opinion rather than factual assertions. Readers are encouraged to always verify any information through reliable sources. The views expressed in these segments do not represent the official stance of any organization or entity. Readers are encouraged to verify information through reliable sources. For any inquiries regarding content usage, permissions, or legal concerns, please contact the company. We publish on Mastodon.

Scroll to Top