Truthlytics - Beyond The Headlines
  • Social Image
  • Social Image
  • Social Image
  • Social Image
  • Social Image
  • Social Image
Truthlytics - Beyond The Headlines

Russia Vetoes Peace Resolution for Sudan

Image

Summary: The United Nations drafted a resolution for peace in Sudan because paramilitary troops have waged war on civilians for 19 months, but Russia alone vetoed the draft.

Russia’s recent move to veto the draft of a United Nations Security Council Resolution for peace in war-torn Sudan has been met with condemnation. The other 14 Security Council members voted in favor of the draft on November 18, 2024.

The resolution draft called for an immediate end to the hostilities and to move toward de-escalation of the conflict with a ceasefire. Talks about a ceasefire have continued for months with no solution thus far.

David Lammy, British Foreign Secretary, stated that the veto was disgraceful and showed Russia’s true colors.

Russian officials believe that the UK has meddled in Sudanese affairs while excluding the Sudanese government, therefore violating their sovereignty. Russia’s representative, Dmitry Polyanskiy, accused the UK of having a double standard; they do not intervene in Israel’s ongoing genocide and human rights violations in Gaza, but they want a peace deal in Sudan.

The 19-month civil war  has destroyed many parts of the country including the capital, Khartoum, and the people of Sudan have faced starvation, famine, homelessness, sexual violence, and killings motivated by ethnic division. The International Organization for Migration has estimated that over 13 million people fled their homes due to the fighting, including roughly 3 million who have fled as refugees. Upwards of 25 million people need humanitarian aid, particularly food aid, which makes it the largest humanitarian crises ever faced.

People have faced diseases due to unsafe living conditions and a lack of basic medical care, and widespread public health crises like the cholera outbreak  which continues to spread.

BBC reports that over 61,000 people have died in Khartoum state alone, which is much higher than the previous estimates. Tom Perriello, United States special envoy for Sudan, believes that as many as 150,000 people have been killed due to the civil war.

While international intervention stalls, the Rapid Support Forces (the RSF), continues to wage war on Sudanese civilians. The RSF is a paramilitary group of roughly 100,000 members which was once operated by the Sudanese government, but their actions in Sudan have been called crimes against humanity by Human Rights Watch.

The United Nations has not declared that the crisis in Sudan is a genocide, but the actions taken against civilians in Sudan falls in line with the definition of genocide which the United Nations decided upon and vowed to prevent and punish from 1948 onward.

This is a developing story.

Share Your Perspective

We invite you to contribute your thoughts and analysis on this article in the comments below.

Subscribe to Truthlytics today to stay informed and dive deeper into the issues that matter.
Already subscribed? Log in to join the conversation and share your thoughts in the comments below!


Comments

Truthlytics - Beyond The Headlines


©2024 Truthlytics, a division and brand of Neptun Green Power d.o.o., Mrkopaljska ulica 5,10000 Zagreb, Croatia - OIB: HR34418596112. All Rights reserved. By using this service, website, newsletter, forum and other functions, users accept the Privacy Policy / Terms and Conditions / Cookie Policy. All content on this site, including text, graphics, logos, and software, is the exclusive property of the company or its licensors and is protected by intellectual property laws. Reproduction, distribution, or use of any material without prior written consent from the company is strictly prohibited. The company reserves the right to modify or update this disclaimer and any related terms and conditions at any time without prior notice. Continued use of the site or services constitutes acceptance of these changes. The content on this website, especially when marked as "Opinion" is intended for informational and entertainment purposes only. It may include elements of opinion, hyperbole, and satire and is not intended to be taken as factual reporting. Opinion content reflects the personal views of the contributors and should not be interpreted as verified factual reporting. This approach aligns with the precedent set in McDougal v. Fox News Network, LLC (Case No. 1:19-cv-11161-MKV, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York), in which the court ruled that a reasonable viewer would understand such content as hyperbolic commentary and opinion rather than factual assertions. Readers are encouraged to always verify any information through reliable sources. The views expressed in these segments do not represent the official stance of any organization or entity. Readers are encouraged to verify information through reliable sources. For any inquiries regarding content usage, permissions, or legal concerns, please contact the company. We publish on Mastodon.

Scroll to Top