Truthlytics - Beyond The Headlines
  • Social Image
  • Social Image
  • Social Image
  • Social Image
  • Social Image
  • Social Image
Truthlytics - Beyond The Headlines

Trump’s Proposal to make Greenland the “Red, White and Blueland”

green and black house near body of water under white sky

United States President Donald Trump first expressed interest in purchasing Greenland in 2019, during his first term, but he did not succeed. Greenland is an autonomous territory of Denmark, and officials in both Greenland and Denmark rejected the idea. The US already has a military presence in Greenland at the Thule Air Base which is operated by the US Space Force in cooperation with Denmark.

In 2024, Trump reintroduced the idea of buying and controlling Greenland for national security purposes. He believes that Greenlanders “want to be with us,” despite their reassurances that they do not wish to become a conquest of the United States.

Danish Prime Minister Mette Fredriksen has said that Greenland is “not for sale.”

Greenland has been a part of the Kingdom of Denmark for 800 years, but Trump said he “[doesn’t] really know what claim Denmark has to it, but it would be a very unfriendly act if they didn’t allow that to happen.”

Anders Vistisen, a Danish member of the European Parliament, reiterated that sentiment and added, “let me put it into words you might understand: Mr. Trump, f*** off.”

Vistisen told POLITICO “There is clearly a need for more adults in the room when the US Administration formulates foreign policy. If these people can’t see how absurd they appear, they are out of touch with reality.”

The Trump administration believes that the island is a strategic location for the US to expand its military presence to protect against foreign threats. They also understand that Greenland has vast natural resources that have immense potential. There are Rare Earth Elements that are needed for electronics and the defense industry; Uranium deposits that could be used for nuclear energy; Iron ore used for steel; Lead, zinc, gold, platinum, rubies, and even sapphires. Greenland has oil and gas reserves offshore, and the rivers create hydropower which has potential benefits.

Trump has expressed his desires for, or “joked” about, annexing various other countries including Canada, the Panama Canal, Mexico, and Gaza.

Legislation was introduced to the US House of Representatives to acquire Greenland on January 13, 2025, named the “Make Greenland Great Again Act.” On February 10, 2025, another bill was introduced to the House called the “Red, White and Blueland Act.”

Republican representative from Georgia, Earl “Buddy” Carter, introduced the “Red, White and Blueland Act,” stating that “America is back and will soon be bigger than ever. . . we will proudly welcome [Greenland’s] people to join the freest nation to ever exist.”

This idea to buy Greenland in pursuit of colonial expansion has been criticized by folks domestically and internationally because colonialism is not favorable.

Share Your Perspective

We invite you to contribute your thoughts and analysis on this article in the comments below.

Subscribe to Truthlytics today to stay informed and dive deeper into the issues that matter.
Already subscribed? Log in to join the conversation and share your thoughts in the comments below!


Comments

Truthlytics - Beyond The Headlines


©2024 Truthlytics, a division and brand of Neptun Green Power d.o.o., Mrkopaljska ulica 5,10000 Zagreb, Croatia - OIB: HR34418596112. All Rights reserved. By using this service, website, newsletter, forum and other functions, users accept the Privacy Policy / Terms and Conditions / Cookie Policy. All content on this site, including text, graphics, logos, and software, is the exclusive property of the company or its licensors and is protected by intellectual property laws. Reproduction, distribution, or use of any material without prior written consent from the company is strictly prohibited. The company reserves the right to modify or update this disclaimer and any related terms and conditions at any time without prior notice. Continued use of the site or services constitutes acceptance of these changes. The content on this website, especially when marked as "Opinion" is intended for informational and entertainment purposes only. It may include elements of opinion, hyperbole, and satire and is not intended to be taken as factual reporting. Opinion content reflects the personal views of the contributors and should not be interpreted as verified factual reporting. This approach aligns with the precedent set in McDougal v. Fox News Network, LLC (Case No. 1:19-cv-11161-MKV, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York), in which the court ruled that a reasonable viewer would understand such content as hyperbolic commentary and opinion rather than factual assertions. Readers are encouraged to always verify any information through reliable sources. The views expressed in these segments do not represent the official stance of any organization or entity. Readers are encouraged to verify information through reliable sources. For any inquiries regarding content usage, permissions, or legal concerns, please contact the company. We publish on Mastodon.

Scroll to Top