US Genocide Support Cost Kamala The Election

A new poll shows what many analysts had suspected all along.

The 2024 U.S. Presidential election has left the Democratic Party reeling, with Vice President Kamala Harris losing to former President Donald Trump in a stunning reversal of 2020’s results. Among the many factors contributing to the loss, a new poll by the IMEU Policy Project and YouGov reveals one pivotal issue: voter dissatisfaction with the Biden-Harris administration’s support for Israel’s actions in Gaza.

This revelation not only underscores the impact of foreign policy on domestic elections but also challenges the narrative that the Democrats’ defeats stemmed from being “too progressive.” Instead, it highlights how alignment with controversial policies, particularly in Gaza, alienated key voter blocs and cost the Democrats critical battleground states.

Foreign Policy as a Deciding Factor

The poll indicates that among voters who supported President Biden in 2020 but opted against Harris in 2024, 29% cited “ending Israel’s violence in Gaza” as their top voting issue. This surpassed even the economy, which 24% of these voters prioritized. The sentiment was particularly strong in battleground states that flipped from Biden to Trump, where 20% of voters named Gaza as their primary concern.

These voters, disillusioned by the administration’s continued military aid to Israel during its operations in Gaza, sent a clear message. Many expressed that they would have been more inclined to support Harris had she diverged from President Biden’s policy, particularly by pledging to withhold further arms shipments to Israel.

A Growing Divide in the Democratic Base

The Biden administration’s stance on Gaza has exposed a widening rift within the Democratic Party. Progressive voters, especially younger generations and minority communities, have increasingly voiced opposition to U.S. support for Israeli military operations. This sentiment aligns with a broader global shift toward viewing Gaza’s plight through the lens of human rights and international law.

However, the administration’s steadfast alignment with Israel alienated many of these voters, who felt betrayed by the party’s failure to address their concerns. For these individuals, the Democratic Party’s foreign policy choices were not just disappointing but unacceptable.

Campaign Finance and Trust Issues

The IMEU poll also revealed that 68% of voters support banning super PACs from unlimited spending in Democratic primaries, while 60% are more likely to back candidates rejecting super PAC donations. These findings suggest that beyond policy issues, voters are increasingly frustrated by the influence of wealthy donors on the Democratic Party’s agenda, including its foreign policy decisions.

For many, the perception that the Biden-Harris administration prioritized the interests of defense contractors and foreign governments over humanitarian concerns deepened their disillusionment.

What the Democrats Must Learn

The results of the 2024 election should serve as a wake-up call for the Democratic Party. The narrative that the party’s losses are due to being “too far left” is increasingly at odds with the data. Instead, the alienation of progressive voters—who are demanding principled stands on issues like Gaza—played a decisive role in the outcome.

Looking ahead to 2028, the Democrats must grapple with how to rebuild trust with their base. Addressing the concerns of voters who prioritize human rights, advocating for a balanced and ethical foreign policy, and reducing the influence of big money in politics are no longer optional—they are imperative.

A Moment of Reckoning

The 2024 election was more than a referendum on the Biden-Harris administration—it was a reckoning with the Democratic Party’s values and priorities. If the Democrats are to reclaim the presidency and retain their relevance in an increasingly polarized political landscape, they must embrace the demands of a new generation of voters who refuse to accept politics as usual.

The question now is whether the Democratic leadership is willing to listen—or whether they will double down on the very choices that cost them the presidency.

Truthlytics remains committed to independent journalism that champions human rights, ethical governance, and informed democracy.