Truthlytics - Beyond The Headlines
  • Social Image
  • Social Image
  • Social Image
  • Social Image
  • Social Image
  • Social Image
Truthlytics - Beyond The Headlines

The Target Isn’t the Ukrainian Army. It’s the Ukrainian Future. 

Image

ODESA — JUNE 17, 2025.

The first drone strike in Odesa came before the sun. By the time the smoke had cleared, Odesa’s historic center was on fire. A kindergarten and an inclusive center for children with disabilities were ripped open. Seventeen people were injured, two of them children. One person was killed. Most of the city was still asleep.

Three days later, while firefighters were still rerouting traffic and patching glass, Russia hit Odesa again. This time it wasn’t just families and children caught in the crosshairs. It was the people trying to save them.

On June 20, a swarm of ten kamikaze drones slammed into residential neighborhoods in Odesa, public transport, and emergency service zones. Fourteen people were wounded. Among them: three State Emergency Service workers injured while responding to the aftermath of the earlier strike. One of them is still in the hospital.

This is not war. This is a pattern.

JUNE 22: SLOVIANSK AND KRAMATORSK

Two cities. One night. Coordinated Russian shelling left four civilians dead and many more injured.

In Sloviansk, a 17-year-old boy was pulled lifeless from the rubble of a home. More than 30 private houses were damaged. So were four apartment buildings, an industrial site, and two government buildings.

In Kramatorsk, the shelling hit residential and industrial zones. Three were confirmed dead. A 14-year-old girl was injured. As of press time, local authorities say people are still believed to be buried under debris.

“The body of a 17-year-old child was found under the rubble,” said Ivan Petrenko, deputy head of Sloviansk Police. “Criminal proceedings have been opened.”

The courts may catch up. But the body count keeps growing.

JUNE 24: DNIPRO BURNS

What happened in Dnipro wasn’t a strike. It was a campaign.

At 11:00 a.m., multiple Russian ballistic missiles tore through the city and its surrounding district of Samar. In a matter of minutes, they hit 46 apartment buildings, 41 homes, 10 kindergartens, eight medical facilities, and a civilian train—No. 52 on the Odesa-Zaporizhzhia route.

Seventeen dead. Over 200 injured. Dozens hospitalized. Entire streets unrecognizable.

“The explosion. Plaster, smoke. Screams,” said Oleksandr, a resident of one of the hit buildings. “We brought the wounded out as best we could.”

“The child was terrified,” said Oleksandr Krymchuk, holding his four-year-old. “I don’t know what will happen.”

What happens is trauma. What happens is the next generation learns to flinch before it walks.

Aftermath inside Train No. 52, Odesa–Zaporizhzhia Route | Courtesy of the Center for International Communications of Ukraine

JULY 4: THE SCHOOL THAT VANISHED

In Kramatorsk, a Tornado-S multiple rocket system struck a vocational school.

No soldiers were there. No munitions. No flag. Just empty classrooms and locked workshops where teenagers once trained to become electricians, welders, mechanics.

“There is simply nowhere to return to,” said Volodymyr, a resident. “Children used to study here. It’s all gone.”

This is not accidental.

THE STRATEGY OF CIVILIAN ERASURE

There are no military gains here. No frontlines breached. No advances made. This is not war as the world understands it. It is civilian erasure disguised as combat.

Russia is targeting civilians:

  • Children (ages 4, 14, 17)
  • Rescue workers
  • Kindergartens
  • Vocational schools
  • Hospitals
  • Trains
  • Inclusive centers
  • Public housing

Each strike undermines the psychological, educational, and structural fabric of Ukraine’s survival.

This is not about territory. It’s about memory, identity, continuity.

This is why kindergartens matter. This is why trains are targeted. This is why rescuers are struck twice.

THE TARGET IS THE FUTURE

When you flatten a school, you do more than destroy a building. You erase routine. You kill a trajectory. You shatter the idea that anything after this could be safe.

Russia is not fighting Ukraine’s army.

It is waging war on its ability to exist tomorrow.

And the world needs to call that what it is: not strategy, not attrition, but the deliberate destruction of a civilian nation. One drone, one child, one classroom at a time.

All information in this report has been verified and sourced by the Center for International Communications of Ukraine, provided to Truthlytics for documentation and public record.

Share Your Perspective

We invite you to contribute your thoughts and analysis on this article in the comments below.

Subscribe to Truthlytics today to stay informed and dive deeper into the issues that matter.
Already subscribed? Log in to join the conversation and share your thoughts in the comments below!


Comments

Truthlytics - Beyond The Headlines


©2024 Truthlytics, a division and brand of Neptun Green Power d.o.o., Mrkopaljska ulica 5,10000 Zagreb, Croatia - OIB: HR34418596112. All Rights reserved. By using this service, website, newsletter, forum and other functions, users accept the Privacy Policy / Terms and Conditions / Cookie Policy. All content on this site, including text, graphics, logos, and software, is the exclusive property of the company or its licensors and is protected by intellectual property laws. Reproduction, distribution, or use of any material without prior written consent from the company is strictly prohibited. The company reserves the right to modify or update this disclaimer and any related terms and conditions at any time without prior notice. Continued use of the site or services constitutes acceptance of these changes. The content on this website, especially when marked as "Opinion" is intended for informational and entertainment purposes only. It may include elements of opinion, hyperbole, and satire and is not intended to be taken as factual reporting. Opinion content reflects the personal views of the contributors and should not be interpreted as verified factual reporting. This approach aligns with the precedent set in McDougal v. Fox News Network, LLC (Case No. 1:19-cv-11161-MKV, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York), in which the court ruled that a reasonable viewer would understand such content as hyperbolic commentary and opinion rather than factual assertions. Readers are encouraged to always verify any information through reliable sources. The views expressed in these segments do not represent the official stance of any organization or entity. Readers are encouraged to verify information through reliable sources. For any inquiries regarding content usage, permissions, or legal concerns, please contact the company. We publish on Mastodon.

Scroll to Top